LDL Cholesterol Calculator
Three formulas (Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, Sampson) in mg/dL and mmol/L
| Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| >189 | Very high |
| 160-189 | High |
| 130-159 | Borderline high |
| 100-129 | Near optimal/above optimal |
| <100 | Optimal |
How LDL is calculated: the three formulas
LDL is usually not measured directly: it is estimated from the lipid panel (total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides). All three formulas share the same logic — LDL = total cholesterol − HDL − VLDL cholesterol — but estimate VLDL cholesterol differently.
1. Friedewald (1972)
LDL = total cholesterol − HDL − (triglycerides / 5) (in mg/dL; in mmol/L the divisor is 2.2).
This is the historic formula, still the most used in laboratories. It assumes a fixed triglyceride-to-VLDL ratio of 5, an assumption that becomes inaccurate when triglycerides are high or LDL is very low.
2. Martin-Hopkins (2013)
Same structure, but the triglyceride divisor is not fixed at 5: it is an adjustable factor picked from a 180-cell table based on non-HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. This makes the estimate more accurate especially with low LDL and high triglycerides.
3. Sampson/NIH (2020)
A closed-form equation developed at the National Institutes of Health, designed to stay accurate even with hypertriglyceridaemia: it is validated up to triglycerides of 800 mg/dL, well beyond the Friedewald limit.
For a complete picture of the atherogenic profile see also non-HDL cholesterol.
Which formula to choose (and when Friedewald breaks down)
The most important limit to know concerns triglycerides. The Friedewald formula is unreliable when triglycerides exceed 400 mg/dL (about 4.5 mmol/L): in those conditions it tends to underestimate LDL, so the calculator does not show the result and prompts you to switch method. This is a check many online calculators skip.
| Situation | Recommended formula |
|---|---|
| Standard lipid panel, triglycerides < 400 mg/dL | Friedewald (reference method) |
| Low LDL and/or high triglycerides (up to 400 mg/dL) | Martin-Hopkins |
| Triglycerides between 400 and 800 mg/dL | Sampson/NIH |
| Triglycerides > 800 mg/dL | Direct LDL measurement |
With very high triglycerides it is worth also checking the metabolic picture: see metabolic syndrome, the HOMA-IR index and the TyG index.
How to interpret the result
The table above shows the reference bands used by this calculator. In short (NCEP ATP III classification, mg/dL):
| LDL (mg/dL) | Category |
|---|---|
| < 100 | Optimal |
| 100 – 129 | Near optimal |
| 130 – 159 | Borderline high |
| 160 – 189 | High |
| ≥ 190 | Very high |
Important: the LDL target is personalised to your overall cardiovascular risk: people at high risk (e.g. diabetes, previous heart attack) have lower targets. The result is not a diagnosis and should be interpreted by a doctor.
Why it matters
LDL is the so-called "bad cholesterol": high levels promote atherosclerosis and raise the risk of heart attack and stroke. It is one of the most common reasons for checking a lipid panel, especially with a family history, high blood pressure, diabetes or familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Because weight and metabolism affect the lipid profile, it can help to also check your BMI, your non-HDL cholesterol and your HOMA-IR index.
How the test is done
- Estimated LDL requires a lipid panel: total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides.
- The blood draw is traditionally done after a 9–12 hour fast, mainly for the triglyceride measurement.
- You can enter the values in mg/dL or mmol/L: select the unit that matches your lab report.
What to do about your result
- Lifestyle: a diet low in saturated fat, physical activity, weight control and not smoking all lower LDL.
- Treatment: depending on risk, your doctor may consider medication (e.g. statins). Do not start or stop treatment on your own.
When to see a professional: consult a doctor if your LDL is high, or if you have a family history of cardiovascular disease or other risk factors. Setting the treatment target is the doctor's role.
Limitations of the formulas
- They are estimates, not a direct measurement of LDL.
- Friedewald is unreliable with triglycerides above 400 mg/dL or a non-fasting sample, and tends to underestimate LDL when triglycerides are high.
- Martin-Hopkins is more accurate at low LDL and high triglycerides, but its factor table is validated for triglycerides below 400 mg/dL.
- Sampson/NIH extends validity up to 800 mg/dL of triglycerides; above that a direct measurement is needed.
Related tools
From the archive
Frequently asked questions
What is the Friedewald formula?
When is the Friedewald formula unreliable?
What is the difference between Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson?
Which units can I use?
Does the result replace blood tests or a doctor's opinion?
Sources
- Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499-502.
- Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA. 2013;310(19):2061-2068.
- Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, et al. A new equation for calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with normolipidemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(5):540-548.
- Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188.